Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs Xeon E5-2680 v3

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs Xeon E5-2680 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

8 / 16

14,777

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2680 v3

12 / 24

14,864

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs Xeon E5-2680 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs Xeon E5-2680 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 120W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2680 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,777 vs 14,864).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2680 v3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2680 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,745 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌700% higher power demand at 120W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2680 v3 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2680 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2680 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2680 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2680 v3 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2680 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,745 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs Xeon E5-2680 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,777 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2680 v3

The Xeon E5-2680 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,864 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2680 v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2680 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v3 — a 21.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U uses the Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U scores 14,777 against the Xeon E5-2680 v3's 14,864 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2680 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2680 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	Xeon E5-2680 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+24%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	2.5 GHz+47%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	14,777	14,864

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2680 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.