EPYC 7301 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7301 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7301 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7301

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+700% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7301 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,777 vs 14,991).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7301, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7301 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7301 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7301 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7301 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7301 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 7301 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7301 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7301

The EPYC 7301 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,991 points. Launch price was $825.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,777 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7301 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7301 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the EPYC 7301 versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U — a 41.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The EPYC 7301 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U uses Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7301 scores 14,991 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U's 14,777 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 7301. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7301 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U.

Feature	EPYC 7301	Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	4.1 GHz+52%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+29%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+700%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark	14,991+1%	14,777

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7301 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.