Core 7 150U vs EPYC 7301

Core 7 150U vs EPYC 7301 Performance Spectrum

Core 7 150U

10 / 12

14,939

0.0%

14,991

+0.3%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 7 150U vs EPYC 7301 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 7 150U vs EPYC 7301: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 7 150U

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,939 vs 14,991).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7301, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

EPYC 7301

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 150U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core 7 150U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 7 150U better than EPYC 7301?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7301 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core 7 150U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7301 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 7 150U still makes the most sense overall. Core 7 150U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 7 150U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 7 150U vs EPYC 7301 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 7 150U

The Core 7 150U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 14,939 points. Launch price was $149.

EPYC 7301

The EPYC 7301 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,991 points. Launch price was $825.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 7 150U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 7301 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7301 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core 7 150U versus 2.7 GHz on the EPYC 7301 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core 7 150U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core 7 150U uses the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7301 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 150U scores 14,939 against the EPYC 7301's 14,991 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 7301. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 150U vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7301.

Feature	Core 7 150U	EPYC 7301
Cores / Threads	10 / 12	16 / 32+60%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+100%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.2 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+433%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	14,939	14,991

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 150U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7301 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.