Core 7 150U vs M2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 7 150U vs M2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 7 150U vs M2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 7 150U

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 20W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

M2

2022

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 150U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,933 vs 14,939).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 20W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 7 150U better than M2?

Yes. Core 7 150U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 17.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 7 150U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 7 150U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 7 150U still makes the most sense overall. Core 7 150U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 7 150U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 7 150U vs M2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 7 150U

The Core 7 150U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 14,939 points. Launch price was $149.

M2

The M2 is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 10 June 2022 (3 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.48 GHz. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,933 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 7 150U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the M2 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core 7 150U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core 7 150U versus 3.48 GHz on the M2 — a 43.2% clock advantage for the Core 7 150U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.424 GHz). The Core 7 150U is built on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 7 150U scores 14,939 against the M2's 14,933 — a 0% lead for the Core 7 150U.

Feature	Core 7 150U	M2
Cores / Threads	10 / 12+25%	8 / 8
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+55%	3.48 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.424 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	20 MB+1500%
Process	10 nm	5 nm-50%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024)	—
PassMark	14,939	14,933