
Core i5-12500TE

EPYC 7301
Core i5-12500TE vs EPYC 7301 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12500TE vs EPYC 7301 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12500TE vs EPYC 7301: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12500TE
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 170W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 770, while EPYC 7301 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7301 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7301, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while EPYC 7301 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7301
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,991 vs 15,008).
- ❌385.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i5-12500TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12500TE better than EPYC 7301?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12500TE vs EPYC 7301 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12500TE
The Core i5-12500TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,008 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 7301
The EPYC 7301 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,991 points. Launch price was $825.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12500TE packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 7301 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7301 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-12500TE versus 2.7 GHz on the EPYC 7301 — a 45.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-12500TE (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-12500TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7301 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12500TE scores 15,008 against the EPYC 7301's 14,991 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-12500TE. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12500TE vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7301.
| Feature | Core i5-12500TE | EPYC 7301 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+59% | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+40860% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 15,008 | 14,991 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 659 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12500TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7301 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12500TE | EPYC 7301 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500TE) / not specified (EPYC 7301). The Core i5-12500TE includes integrated graphics (UHD 770), while the EPYC 7301 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-12500TE rivals Core i5-12400T.
| Feature | Core i5-12500TE | EPYC 7301 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















