
Core i5-12500TE

Xeon E5-4610 v4
Core i5-12500TE vs Xeon E5-4610 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12500TE vs Xeon E5-4610 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12500TE vs Xeon E5-4610 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12500TE
2022Why buy it
- β Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 770, while Xeon E5-4610 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (15,008 vs 15,084).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4610 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4610 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-4610 v4
2016Why buy it
- β +0.5% higher PassMark.
- β +38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- β200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i5-12500TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12500TE better than Xeon E5-4610 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12500TE vs Xeon E5-4610 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12500TE
The Core i5-12500TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,008 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4610 v4
The Xeon E5-4610 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015β2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,084 points. Launch price was $1,219.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12500TE packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads β the Xeon E5-4610 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-12500TE versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4610 v4 β a 82% clock advantage for the Core i5-12500TE (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-12500TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 uses Broadwell (2015β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12500TE scores 15,008 against the Xeon E5-4610 v4's 15,084 β a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-4610 v4. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12500TE vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-4610 v4.
| Feature | Core i5-12500TE | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+139% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz+6% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 25 MB+39% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB+100% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Broadwell (2015β2019) |
| PassMark | 15,008 | 15,084 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 659 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12500TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12500TE | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500TE) / not specified (Xeon E5-4610 v4). The Core i5-12500TE includes integrated graphics (UHD 770), while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-12500TE rivals Core i5-12400T.
| Feature | Core i5-12500TE | Xeon E5-4610 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD 770 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Budget | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














