Core i5-12500TE vs Ryzen 5 7533HS

Intel

Core i5-12500TE

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2022
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 7533HS

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2024
Ryzen family
·······

Core i5-12500TE vs Ryzen 5 7533HS Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-12500TE vs Ryzen 5 7533HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-12500TE vs Ryzen 5 7533HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-12500TE

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 770, while Ryzen 5 7533HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (15,008 vs 15,231).
  • Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7533HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 5 7533HS

2024

Why buy it

  • +1.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12500TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7533HS better than Core i5-12500TE?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-12500TE is ahead with a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 7533HS pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 7533HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 7533HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12500TE is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 5 7533HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-12500TE is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12500TE is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (66.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 7533HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-12500TE vs Ryzen 5 7533HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-12500TE

The Core i5-12500TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,008 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 5 7533HS

The Ryzen 5 7533HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 15,231 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-12500TE and Ryzen 5 7533HS share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-12500TE versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7533HS — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7533HS (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-12500TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7533HS uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12500TE scores 15,008 against the Ryzen 5 7533HS's 15,231 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 7533HS. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12500TE vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7533HS.

FeatureCore i5-12500TERyzen 5 7533HS
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz+2%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
3.3 GHz+74%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+13%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm
6 nm-40%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)
PassMark
15,008
15,231+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
659
Geekbench 6 Single
1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12500TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7533HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-12500TERyzen 5 7533HS
Socket
LGA1700
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500TE) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7533HS). The Core i5-12500TE includes integrated graphics (UHD 770), while the Ryzen 5 7533HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-12500TE rivals Core i5-12400T.

FeatureCore i5-12500TERyzen 5 7533HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD 770
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget