EPYC 7301 vs Xeon E5-4610 v4

EPYC 7301 vs Xeon E5-4610 v4 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7301

16 / 32

14,991

0.0%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-4610 v4

10 / 20

15,084

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7301 vs Xeon E5-4610 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7301 vs Xeon E5-4610 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7301

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+156% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,991 vs 15,084).
❌61.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 105W.

Xeon E5-4610 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 105W instead of 170W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7301 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4610 v4 better than EPYC 7301?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7301 is ahead with a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4610 v4 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. EPYC 7301 also has the bigger cache pool with 156% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4610 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4610 v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-4610 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7301 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016) and 156% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7301 vs Xeon E5-4610 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7301

The EPYC 7301 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,991 points. Launch price was $825.

Xeon E5-4610 v4

The Xeon E5-4610 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,084 points. Launch price was $1,219.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7301 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the EPYC 7301 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the EPYC 7301 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4610 v4 — a 40% clock advantage for the EPYC 7301 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The EPYC 7301 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7301 scores 14,991 against the Xeon E5-4610 v4's 15,084 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-4610 v4. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7301 vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-4610 v4.

Feature	EPYC 7301	Xeon E5-4610 v4
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+60%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+50%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+22%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+156%	25 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+20380%	2.5 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	14,991	15,084

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7301 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4610 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.