EPYC 7301 vs Xeon E-2286M

EPYC 7301 vs Xeon E-2286M Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7301

16 / 32

14,991

0.0%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E-2286M

8 / 16

15,080

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7301 vs Xeon E-2286M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7301 vs Xeon E-2286M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7301

2017

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,991 vs 15,080).
❌277.8% higher power demand at 170W vs 45W.

Xeon E-2286M

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 170W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2286M better than EPYC 7301?

Yes. Xeon E-2286M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2286M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2286M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2286M still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E-2286M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2286M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7301 vs Xeon E-2286M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7301

The EPYC 7301 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,991 points. Launch price was $825.

Xeon E-2286M

The Xeon E-2286M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 15,080 points. Launch price was $623.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7301 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E-2286M offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7301 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the EPYC 7301 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2286M — a 59.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2286M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7301 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2286M uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7301 scores 14,991 against the Xeon E-2286M's 15,080 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E-2286M. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7301 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2286M.

Feature	EPYC 7301	Xeon E-2286M
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	5 GHz+85%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+300%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
PassMark	14,991	15,080

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7301 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2286M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.