
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Popular choices:

Xeon 6325P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Xeon 6325P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon 6325P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,346 vs 16,666).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
2022Xeon 6325P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Xeon 6325P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,346 vs 16,666).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U better than Xeon 6325P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 125 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 417 FPS | 409 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 357 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Xeon 6325P


Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,666 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P
The Xeon 6325P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 16,346 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6325P offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon 6325P — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon 6325P (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses the Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon 6325P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U scores 16,666 against the Xeon 6325P's 16,346 — a 1.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon 6325P.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+33% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 16,666+2% | 16,346 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6325P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U | Xeon 6325P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











