Core Ultra 5 135U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

Core Ultra 5 135U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 5 135U

12 / 14

16,900

+1.4%

16,666

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 135U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 135U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 135U

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,666 vs 16,900).
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 135U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 135U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 135U better than Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is ahead with a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 135U pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 135U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 14 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 135U still makes the most sense overall. Core Ultra 5 135U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 135U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FCBGA2049 and DDR5 instead of FP6, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 14 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Ultra 5 135U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 135U

The Core Ultra 5 135U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,900 points. Launch price was $332.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,666 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 135U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135U versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 135U uses the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 135U scores 16,900 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U's 16,666 — a 1.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 135U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 135U	Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Cores / Threads	12 / 14+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.5 GHz+2%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Meteor Lake-P (2023)	Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)
PassMark	16,900+1%	16,666
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,315	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,948	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 135U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 135U	Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Socket	FCBGA2049	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core Ultra 5 135U) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U). The Core Ultra 5 135U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U requires a dedicated GPU.