Core Ultra 5 135U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

Intel

Core Ultra 5 135U

12 Cores14 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 135U

2023

Why buy it

  • +1.4% higher PassMark.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (16,666 vs 16,900).
  • Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 135U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 135U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 135U better than Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is ahead with a 4.1% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 135U pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 135U is the better fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 14 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 135U still looks like the safer overall buy. Core Ultra 5 135U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 1.4% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 135U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FCBGA2049 and DDR5 instead of FP6, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 14 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 135URyzen 7 PRO 5875U
1080p
low181 FPS174 FPS
medium146 FPS151 FPS
high118 FPS122 FPS
ultra98 FPS103 FPS
1440p
low147 FPS148 FPS
medium117 FPS126 FPS
high94 FPS101 FPS
ultra78 FPS85 FPS
4K
low82 FPS83 FPS
medium71 FPS76 FPS
high56 FPS61 FPS
ultra44 FPS47 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 135URyzen 7 PRO 5875U
1080p
low198 FPS251 FPS
medium164 FPS211 FPS
high150 FPS185 FPS
ultra131 FPS164 FPS
1440p
low174 FPS216 FPS
medium148 FPS188 FPS
high138 FPS168 FPS
ultra119 FPS144 FPS
4K
low141 FPS148 FPS
medium124 FPS133 FPS
high117 FPS127 FPS
ultra101 FPS110 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 5 135URyzen 7 PRO 5875U
1080p
low422 FPS417 FPS
medium422 FPS417 FPS
high422 FPS417 FPS
ultra422 FPS417 FPS
1440p
low422 FPS417 FPS
medium422 FPS417 FPS
high422 FPS411 FPS
ultra422 FPS346 FPS
4K
low422 FPS396 FPS
medium384 FPS338 FPS
high334 FPS295 FPS
ultra266 FPS235 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 5 135URyzen 7 PRO 5875U
1080p
low422 FPS417 FPS
medium422 FPS417 FPS
high422 FPS417 FPS
ultra422 FPS417 FPS
1440p
low422 FPS417 FPS
medium422 FPS417 FPS
high422 FPS417 FPS
ultra422 FPS417 FPS
4K
low422 FPS417 FPS
medium422 FPS417 FPS
high419 FPS381 FPS
ultra367 FPS329 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 135U and Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

Intel

Core Ultra 5 135U

The Core Ultra 5 135U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,900 points. Launch price was $332.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,666 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 135U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135U versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 135U uses the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 135U scores 16,900 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U's 16,666 — a 1.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 135U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 135URyzen 7 PRO 5875U
Cores / Threads
12 / 14+50%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz+2%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+300%
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm
7 nm
Architecture
Meteor Lake-P (2023)
Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)
PassMark
16,900+1%
16,666
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,315
Geekbench 6 Single
1,948
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 135U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 135URyzen 7 PRO 5875U
Socket
FCBGA2049
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core Ultra 5 135U) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U). The Core Ultra 5 135U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 135URyzen 7 PRO 5875U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes