
Core Ultra 5 135U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 135U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,666 vs 16,900).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 135U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 135U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 135U
2023Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,666 vs 16,900).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 135U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 135U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 135U better than Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135U | Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135U | Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 110 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135U | Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 346 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 235 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 135U | Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 329 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 135U and Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

Core Ultra 5 135U
Core Ultra 5 135U
The Core Ultra 5 135U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,900 points. Launch price was $332.


Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,666 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 135U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135U versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 135U uses the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 135U scores 16,900 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U's 16,666 — a 1.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 135U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135U | Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-P (2023) | Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) |
| PassMark | 16,900+1% | 16,666 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,315 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,948 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 135U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135U | Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core Ultra 5 135U) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U). The Core Ultra 5 135U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135U | Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











