
Core Ultra 5 135U

Core Ultra 5 228V
Core Ultra 5 135U vs Core Ultra 5 228V Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 135U vs Core Ultra 5 228V FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 135U vs Core Ultra 5 228V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 135U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,315 vs 9,932).
Core Ultra 5 228V
2024Why buy it
- ✅+6.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 135U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $295 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 228V better than Core Ultra 5 135U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 135U vs Core Ultra 5 228V Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 135U
The Core Ultra 5 135U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,900 points. Launch price was $332.

Core Ultra 5 228V
The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 135U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 228V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135U versus 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 135U uses the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 135U scores 16,900 against the Core Ultra 5 228V's 16,955 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Ultra 5 228V. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,315 vs 9,932 (6.4% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,948 vs 2,585, a 28.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 228V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,000 vs 10,053 (22.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135U vs 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135U | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+50% | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.1 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core)+25% |
| Process | 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-P (2023) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| PassMark | 16,900 | 16,955 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,315 | 9,932+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,948 | 2,585+33% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,000 | 10,053+26% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 135U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core Ultra 5 135U versus LPDDR5X-8533 on the Core Ultra 5 228V — the Core Ultra 5 228V supports 52.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 135U supports up to 96 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 135U) vs 8 (Core Ultra 5 228V) — the Core Ultra 5 135U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 5 135U) and SoC (Core Ultra 5 228V).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135U | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FCBGA2833 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | LPDDR5X-8533+52% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB+200% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+150% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Both support Yes virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc Graphics (Core Ultra 5 135U) and Arc 130V (Core Ultra 5 228V) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 135U | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics | Arc 130V |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













