Core Ultra 5 135U vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

Core Ultra 5 135U vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 5 135U

12 / 14

16,900

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

8 / 16

16,829

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 135U vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 135U vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 135U

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper 1900X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,829 vs 16,900).
❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 135U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 135U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1900X better than Core Ultra 5 135U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 1900X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 5 135U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 135U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 14 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper 1900X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $549 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core Ultra 5 135U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 135U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FCBGA2049 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 14 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 135U vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 135U

The Core Ultra 5 135U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,900 points. Launch price was $332.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 135U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135U versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 135U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 135U uses the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 135U scores 16,900 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X's 16,829 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 135U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135U vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 135U	Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Cores / Threads	12 / 14+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+10%	4 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	3.8 GHz+137%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	32 MB+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Meteor Lake-P (2023)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	16,900	16,829
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,315	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,948	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 135U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 135U	Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Socket	FCBGA2049	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core Ultra 5 135U) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1900X). The Core Ultra 5 135U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X requires a dedicated GPU.