Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z vs Xeon E5-2699 v3

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

8 / 16

20,084

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2699 v3

18 / 36

20,028

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z vs Xeon E5-2699 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 145W, a 141W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v3, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2699 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,028 vs 20,084).
❌3525% higher power demand at 145W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z better than Xeon E5-2699 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2699 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 18/36. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

The Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 20,084 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2699 v3

The Xeon E5-2699 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 20,028 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v3 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v3 — a 27.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z uses the Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z scores 20,084 against the Xeon E5-2699 v3's 20,028 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z	Xeon E5-2699 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	4.75 GHz+32%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+17%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	45 MB (total)+181%
L2 Cache	4 MB	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	6 nm-73%	22 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	20,084	20,028

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z	Xeon E5-2699 v3
Socket	FP7	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2699 v3). Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2699 v3 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.