
Core i5-13400T

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP7 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 730, while Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,084 vs 20,265).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP7, while Core i5-13400T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400T better than Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400T
The Core i5-13400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,265 points. Launch price was $221.


Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
The Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 20,084 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400T packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-13400T versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-13400T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z uses Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400T scores 20,265 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z's 20,084 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-13400T. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400T vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z.
| Feature | Core i5-13400T | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.75 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2.7 GHz+108% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 4 MB+220% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Rembrandt U (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 20,265 | 20,084 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,094 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,364 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,135 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400T | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400T) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z). The Core i5-13400T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 730), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400T targets Energy Efficient Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400T | Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Energy Efficient Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













