Ryzen 9 270
VS
Core Ultra 9 185H

Ryzen 9 270 vs Core Ultra 9 185H

AMD

Ryzen 9 270

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 9 185H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 185H

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
104%
#152
Core Ultra 9 185H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
99%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
97%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
95%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
95%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Ultra 9 185H delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 9 270 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightRyzen 9 270Core Ultra 9 185H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-H (2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 9 270Core Ultra 9 185H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 270 and Core Ultra 9 185H

AMD

Ryzen 9 270

The Ryzen 9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,602 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 9 185H

The Core Ultra 9 185H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,360 points. Launch price was $640.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 270 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 185H offers 16 cores / 22 threads — the Core Ultra 9 185H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 270 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 185H — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 270 (base: 4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Ryzen 9 270 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 185H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 270 scores 29,602 against the Core Ultra 9 185H's 29,360 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 270. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 18,030 (8.9% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 185H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,636 vs 2,700, a 2.4% lead for the Core Ultra 9 185H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,000 vs 17,000 (26.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 185H). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 270 vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 185H.

FeatureRyzen 9 270Core Ultra 9 185H
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 22+100%
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+2%
5.1 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+3%
3.9 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
24 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
4 nm-43%
7 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
PassMark
29,602
29,360
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
18,030+9%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,636
2,700+2%
Geekbench 6 Multi
13,000
17,000+31%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 270 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 185H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 270 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 270) vs 28 (Core Ultra 9 185H) — the Core Ultra 9 185H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8 platform (Ryzen 9 270) and Meteor Lake SoC (Core Ultra 9 185H).

FeatureRyzen 9 270Core Ultra 9 185H
Socket
FP8
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+167%
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
28+40%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 270 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 270 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 270) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 9 185H). Both include integrated graphics Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 270) and Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 9 185H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 270 targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, Core Ultra 9 185H targets Mainstream Performance / AI Workloads. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 270 rivals Core i9-13900H; Core Ultra 9 185H rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS.

FeatureRyzen 9 270Core Ultra 9 185H
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SVM
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Professional Content Creation Laptop
Mainstream Performance / AI Workloads