Ryzen 9 3900X
VS
Xeon Platinum 8168

Ryzen 9 3900X vs Xeon Platinum 8168

AMD

Ryzen 9 3900X

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8168

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 3900X

#252
Core i9-10900TE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $180
107%
#253
Core i9-12900T
MSRP: $489|Avg: $378
106%
#254
Core i5-12600T
MSRP: $223|Avg: $223
106%
#255
Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
106%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
53%
#256
Ryzen 5 3500X
MSRP: $155|Avg: $171
104%
#257
Core i9-14900
MSRP: $524|Avg: $589
104%
#258
Core i5-8600
MSRP: $213|Avg: $130
104%
#259
Core i3-9100TE
MSRP: $122|Avg: $60
104%
#260
Core i5-12500T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $214
104%
#261
Core i9-13900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $599
102%
#262
Core i7-11700
MSRP: $323|Avg: $274
102%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
51%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
102%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
101%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
101%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
100%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
100%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
100%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
99%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
99%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
99%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
99%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
98%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
44%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
98%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
97%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
96%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
96%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
42%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8168

#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
125%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
124%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
113%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
113%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
109%
#29
Xeon Platinum 8168
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon Platinum 8168 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightRyzen 9 3900XXeon Platinum 8168
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($441)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm)
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 9 3900X ($441), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($441 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightRyzen 9 3900XXeon Platinum 8168
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($441)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon Platinum 8168

AMD

Ryzen 9 3900X

The Ryzen 9 3900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 32,517 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8168

The Xeon Platinum 8168 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 32,373 points. Launch price was $5,890.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 3900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8168 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8168 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8168 — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 9 3900X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8168 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 3900X scores 32,517 against the Xeon Platinum 8168's 32,373 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900X vs 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8168.

FeatureRyzen 9 3900XXeon Platinum 8168
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
24 / 48+100%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+24%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+41%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB+94%
33 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
24 MB+4700%
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
32,517
32,373
Geekbench 6 Single
1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 3900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8168 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3900X versus 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8168 — the Xeon Platinum 8168 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8168 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 128 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 3900X) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8168). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 3900X) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8168) — the Xeon Platinum 8168 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550 (Ryzen 9 3900X) and C621 (Xeon Platinum 8168).

FeatureRyzen 9 3900XXeon Platinum 8168
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
2666+66550%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+17476167%
768
RAM Channels
2
6+200%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
24
48+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 3900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8168 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8168). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 3900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8168 rivals EPYC 7501.

FeatureRyzen 9 3900XXeon Platinum 8168
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Workstation