Ryzen 9 4900HS
VS
Ryzen 5 220

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Ryzen 5 220

AMD

Ryzen 9 4900HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 220

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 4900HS

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
101%
#146
Ryzen 9 4900HS
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
97%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
95%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 220

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
114%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
107%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
105%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
96%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 5 220 leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen 9 4900HS is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen 9 4900HSRyzen 5 220
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 9 4900HSRyzen 5 220
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 4900HS and Ryzen 5 220

AMD

Ryzen 9 4900HS

The Ryzen 9 4900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 18,793 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 5 220

The Ryzen 5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,762 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 4900HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 220 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 9 4900HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900HS versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 220 — a 13% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 220 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 4900HS uses the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 220 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 4900HS scores 18,793 against the Ryzen 5 220's 18,762 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 4900HS. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900HS vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 220.

FeatureRyzen 9 4900HSRyzen 5 220
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
4.9 GHz+14%
Base Clock
3 GHz
3.2 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Renoir (Zen 2) (2020)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
18,793
18,762
Geekbench 6 Single
1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 4900HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 220 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4-4266 on the Ryzen 9 4900HS versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 5 220 — the Ryzen 5 220 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Ryzen 9 4900HS) vs 14 (Ryzen 5 220) — the Ryzen 5 220 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureRyzen 9 4900HSRyzen 5 220
Socket
FP6
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-4266
DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
14+75%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 220 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Vega 8 (Ryzen 9 4900HS) and Radeon 740M (Ryzen 5 220) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 4900HS targets Mobile High-End, Ryzen 5 220 targets Thin and Light Laptop.

FeatureRyzen 9 4900HSRyzen 5 220
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Vega 8
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile High-End
Thin and Light Laptop