Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon w3-2425

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon w3-2425 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 4900HS

8 / 16

18,793

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon w3-2425

6 / 12

18,776

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon w3-2425 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon w3-2425: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 4900HS

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Vega 8, while Xeon w3-2425 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2425 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w3-2425

2023

Why buy it

✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,776 vs 18,793).
❌Launch MSRP is still $529 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 4900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 4900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w3-2425 better than Ryzen 9 4900HS?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon w3-2425 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 4900HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 4900HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w3-2425 is the better buy right now. Xeon w3-2425 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $529 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen 9 4900HS is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (35.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w3-2425 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of FP6, and 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Xeon w3-2425 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 4900HS

The Ryzen 9 4900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 18,793 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon w3-2425

The Xeon w3-2425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,776 points. Launch price was $529.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 4900HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w3-2425 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 9 4900HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900HS versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon w3-2425 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w3-2425 (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 4900HS uses the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon w3-2425 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 4900HS scores 18,793 against the Xeon w3-2425's 18,776 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 4900HS. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900HS vs 15 MB on the Xeon w3-2425.

Feature	Ryzen 9 4900HS	Xeon w3-2425
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.4 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	15 MB+88%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Renoir (Zen 2) (2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	18,793	18,776

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 4900HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon w3-2425 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 9 4900HS	Xeon w3-2425
Socket	FP6	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-4266	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 4900HS) / not specified (Xeon w3-2425). The Ryzen 9 4900HS includes integrated graphics (Vega 8), while the Xeon w3-2425 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 4900HS targets Mobile High-End.