Core Ultra 7 258V vs Ryzen 9 4900HS

Core Ultra 7 258V vs Ryzen 9 4900HS Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 7 258V

8 / 8

18,947

+0.8%

18,793

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 7 258V vs Ryzen 9 4900HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 7 258V vs Ryzen 9 4900HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 7 258V

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 4900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 9 4900HS

2020

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 258V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,793 vs 18,947).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 258V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 258V better than Ryzen 9 4900HS?

Yes. Core Ultra 7 258V is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 7 258V is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 258V is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 7 258V is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 7 258V comes in at an unclear MSRP at $450 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (42.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 258V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA2833 and DDR5 instead of FP6, 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 7 258V vs Ryzen 9 4900HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 258V

The Core Ultra 7 258V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,947 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 9 4900HS

The Ryzen 9 4900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 18,793 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 258V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 9 4900HS's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 258V versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900HS — a 11% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 258V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 9 4900HS uses Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 258V scores 18,947 against the Ryzen 9 4900HS's 18,793 — a 0.8% lead for the Core Ultra 7 258V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 258V vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900HS.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 258V	Ryzen 9 4900HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+12%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2.5 MB (per core)+400%	512 kB (per core)
Process	3 nm-57%	7 nm
Architecture	Lunar Lake (2024)	Renoir (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark	18,947	18,793
Cinebench R23 Multi	10,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,750	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 4900HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5X-8533 on the Core Ultra 7 258V versus LPDDR4-4266 on the Ryzen 9 4900HS — the Core Ultra 7 258V supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 4900HS supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 8 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 258V	Ryzen 9 4900HS
Socket	FCBGA2833	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5X-8533+100%	LPDDR4-4266
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 258V) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 4900HS). Both include integrated graphics — Arc 140V (Core Ultra 7 258V) and Vega 8 (Ryzen 9 4900HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 258V targets Gaming, Ryzen 9 4900HS targets Mobile High-End. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 258V rivals Ryzen 7 8840U.