
Ryzen 5 220

Ryzen 9 4900HS
Ryzen 5 220 vs Ryzen 9 4900HS Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 220 vs Ryzen 9 4900HS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 220 vs Ryzen 9 4900HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (14 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,762 vs 18,793).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 4900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 220 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 220 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 220 better than Ryzen 9 4900HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 220 vs Ryzen 9 4900HS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 220
The Ryzen 5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,762 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 4900HS
The Ryzen 9 4900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 18,793 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 220 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 4900HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 4900HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 220 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900HS — a 13% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 220 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 4900HS uses Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 220 scores 18,762 against the Ryzen 9 4900HS's 18,793 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 4900HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 220 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 220 | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+14% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+7% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 18,762 | 18,793 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,700 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 220 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 4900HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 5 220 versus LPDDR4-4266 on the Ryzen 9 4900HS — the Ryzen 5 220 supports 31.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 14 (Ryzen 5 220) vs 8 (Ryzen 9 4900HS) — the Ryzen 5 220 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 220 | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+31% | LPDDR4-4266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 14+75% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 220 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 740M (Ryzen 5 220) and Vega 8 (Ryzen 9 4900HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 220 targets Thin and Light Laptop, Ryzen 9 4900HS targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 220 | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 740M | Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Thin and Light Laptop | Mobile High-End |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













