Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon E5-2695 v4

Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon E5-2695 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 220

6 / 12

18,762

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2695 v4

18 / 36

18,835

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon E5-2695 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon E5-2695 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 220

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 120W, a 92W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (14 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 740M, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,762 vs 18,835).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2695 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 220 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌328.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 220 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 220 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 220 better than Xeon E5-2695 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2695 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 220 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2695 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 220 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 220 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2695 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (125.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 220 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon E5-2695 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 220

The Ryzen 5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,762 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2695 v4

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,835 points. Launch price was $2,424.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 220 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 220 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 — a 39% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 220 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 220 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 220 scores 18,762 against the Xeon E5-2695 v4's 18,835 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2695 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 220 vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2695 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 220	Xeon E5-2695 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	18 / 36+200%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+48%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+52%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	45 MB+181%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	4.5 MB+350%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	18,762	18,835
Geekbench 6 Single	1,300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,700	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 220 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 220	Xeon E5-2695 v4
Socket	FP8	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	14	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 220) / not specified (Xeon E5-2695 v4). The Ryzen 5 220 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 220 targets Thin and Light Laptop.