Ryzen 5 220
Xeon W-1350
Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon W-1350 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon W-1350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon W-1350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $105 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.1 vs 73.5 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 80W, a 52W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,700 vs 9,104).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1350, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 20 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon W-1350.
Xeon W-1350
2021Why buy it
- ✅+18.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 20 PCIe lanes vs 14.
- ✅42.9% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 14) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 220.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 220 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.5 vs 125.1 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 220 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 220 better than Xeon W-1350?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon W-1350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 5 220
The Ryzen 5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,762 points. Launch price was $299.
Xeon W-1350
The Xeon W-1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,742 points. Launch price was $255.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 220 and Xeon W-1350 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 220 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-1350 — a 2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 220 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-1350 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 220 scores 18,762 against the Xeon W-1350's 18,742 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 220. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,300 vs 2,140, a 48.8% lead for the Xeon W-1350 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,700 vs 9,104 (16.7% advantage for the Xeon W-1350). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 220 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 220 | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+33% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 18,762 | 18,742 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,300 | 2,140+65% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,700 | 9,104+18% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 220 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1350 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 5 220 versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-1350 — the Ryzen 5 220 supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-1350 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 14 (Ryzen 5 220) vs 20 (Xeon W-1350) — the Xeon W-1350 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 5 220) and W580,C252,C256 (Xeon W-1350).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 220 | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+75% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 14 | 20+43% |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 220) vs Yes (Xeon W-1350). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 740M (Ryzen 5 220) and UHD Graphics P750 (Xeon W-1350) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 220 targets Thin and Light Laptop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 220 | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 740M | UHD Graphics P750 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Thin and Light Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 220 was priced at $150, while the Xeon W-1350 came in at $255. On launch pricing ($150 vs $255), Ryzen 5 220 was $105 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 220 delivers 125.1 pts/$ vs 73.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1350 — making the Ryzen 5 220 the 52% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 220 | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-41% | $255 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.1+70% | 73.5 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 5 220 and Xeon W-1350
