Ryzen 5 220
VS
Xeon W-1350

Ryzen 5 220 vs Xeon W-1350

AMD

Ryzen 5 220

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon W-1350

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 5 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 220

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
114%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
107%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
105%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
96%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-1350

#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
104%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
100%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($255) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-1350 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightRyzen 5 220Xeon W-1350
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($150)
⚠️ Higher cost ($255)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-S (2021) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 5 220 ($150), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($105 less, 41% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightRyzen 5 220Xeon W-1350
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+70%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($150)
⚠️ Higher cost ($255)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 220 and Xeon W-1350

AMD

Ryzen 5 220

The Ryzen 5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,762 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon W-1350

The Xeon W-1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,742 points. Launch price was $255.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 220 and Xeon W-1350 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 220 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-1350 — a 2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 220 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-1350 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 220 scores 18,762 against the Xeon W-1350's 18,742 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 220. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,300 vs 2,140, a 48.8% lead for the Xeon W-1350 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,700 vs 9,104 (16.7% advantage for the Xeon W-1350). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 220 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350.

FeatureRyzen 5 220Xeon W-1350
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz
5 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.3 GHz+3%
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)+33%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark
18,762
18,742
Geekbench 6 Single
1,300
2,140+65%
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,700
9,104+18%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 220 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1350 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 5 220 versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-1350 — the Ryzen 5 220 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-1350 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 14 (Ryzen 5 220) vs 20 (Xeon W-1350) — the Xeon W-1350 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 5 220) and W580,C252,C256 (Xeon W-1350).

FeatureRyzen 5 220Xeon W-1350
Socket
FP8
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600+25%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
128 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
14
20+43%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 220) vs Yes (Xeon W-1350). Both include integrated graphics Radeon 740M (Ryzen 5 220) and UHD Graphics P750 (Xeon W-1350) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 220 targets Thin and Light Laptop.

FeatureRyzen 5 220Xeon W-1350
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 740M
UHD Graphics P750
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Yes
Target Use
Thin and Light Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 220 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1350 debuted at $255. At current prices ($150 vs $255), the Ryzen 5 220 is $105 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 220 delivers 125.1 pts/$ vs 73.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1350 — making the Ryzen 5 220 the 52% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 5 220Xeon W-1350
MSRP
$150-41%
$255
Avg Price (30d)
$150-41%
$255
Performance per Dollar
125.1+70%
73.5
Release Date
2025
2021