
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- β Costs $3,942 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- β Delivers 406.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- β Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 44,510).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019Why buy it
- β Costs $3,942 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- β Delivers 406.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- β Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 44,510).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- β166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 3970X better than Ryzen 9 5900X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 806 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 528 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 261 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 927 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 862 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 765 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 776 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 1325 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 1073 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 1031 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 900 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 778 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 744 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X offers 32 cores / 64 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X β a 6.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses Matisse (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X's 62,946 β a 47.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 44,510 (71.8% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,174 vs 1,664, a 26.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,888 vs 13,739 (14.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 32 / 64+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+7% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 128 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020β2022) | Matisse (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 38,955 | 62,946+62% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | 44,510+112% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174+31% | 1,664 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | 13,739+16% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) β the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Workstation | β |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X debuted at $4491. On MSRP ($549 vs $4491), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $3942 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X β making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 134% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-88% | $4491 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+407% | 14.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












