
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6438Y+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,058 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,607 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 195.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 24.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,607 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 205W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 62,660).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6438Y+, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6438Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6438Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+60.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($2,607 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌95.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon Gold 6438Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,058 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,607 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 195.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 24.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,607 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 205W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+60.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 62,660).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6438Y+, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6438Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($2,607 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌95.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon Gold 6438Y+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 98 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 961 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 906 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 822 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 831 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 739 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 615 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 310 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 916 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 832 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 717 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 634 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon Gold 6438Y+


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon Gold 6438Y+
Xeon Gold 6438Y+
The Xeon Gold 6438Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 62,660 points. Launch price was $3,141.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon Gold 6438Y+'s 62,660 — a 46.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6438Y+. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6438Y+.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 32 / 64+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+20% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+85% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+7% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 38,955 | 62,660+61% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ — the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6438Y+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6438Y+). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6438Y+) — the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6438Y+).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 4800+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3276700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 80+233% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6438Y+). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Xeon Gold 6438Y+ rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ debuted at $2607. On MSRP ($549 vs $2607), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $2058 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 24.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 98.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-79% | $2607 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+196% | 24.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












