
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-3323
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 142.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 220W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon W-3323
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,822 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($949 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌109.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon W-3323
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 142.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 220W, a 115W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,822 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($949 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌109.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon W-3323?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 162 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 696 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 696 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 273 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 696 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 696 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 602 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 533 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 338 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon W-3323


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon W-3323
Xeon W-3323
The Xeon W-3323 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,822 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon W-3323 share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-3323 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3323 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon W-3323's 27,822 — a 33.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3323.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+23% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+6% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+256% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 38,955+40% | 27,822 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3323 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) / not specified (Xeon W-3323). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3323 debuted at $949. On MSRP ($549 vs $949), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $400 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 29.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3323 — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 83.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-42% | $949 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+142% | 29.3 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












