Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Xeon W-1370

Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Xeon W-1370 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 6900HS

8 / 16

23,040

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-1370

8 / 16

22,948

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Xeon W-1370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Xeon W-1370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 6900HS

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Xeon W-1370 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W-1370

2021

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 6900HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,948 vs 23,040).
❌Launch MSRP is still $323 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 6900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 6900HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 6900HS better than Xeon W-1370?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1370 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 6900HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 6900HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 6900HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 6900HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-1370 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 9 6900HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $323 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-1370 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 6900HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Xeon W-1370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 6900HS

The Ryzen 9 6900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,040 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1370

The Xeon W-1370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,948 points. Launch price was $362.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 9 6900HS and Xeon W-1370 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 6900HS versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1370 — a 4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 9 6900HS uses the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon W-1370 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 23,040 against the Xeon W-1370's 22,948 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 6900HS. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen 9 6900HS	Xeon W-1370
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	5.1 GHz+4%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+14%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	6 nm-57%	14 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	23,040	22,948
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,445	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,854	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,732	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 6900HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1370 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 9 6900HS	Xeon W-1370
Socket	FP7	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 6900HS) / not specified (Xeon W-1370). The Ryzen 9 6900HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Xeon W-1370 requires a dedicated GPU.