EPYC 7351
VS
Ryzen 9 6900HS

EPYC 7351 vs Ryzen 9 6900HS

AMD

EPYC 7351

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 6900HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7351

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
537%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
4%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
10%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
9%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
9%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
8%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
101%
#8
EPYC 7351
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
90%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
70%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
69%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
63%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 6900HS

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
106%
#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
101%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
101%
#84
Ryzen 9 6900HS
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
100%
#96
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
93%
#97
Core Ultra 5 226V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7351 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7351Ryzen 9 6900HS
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) / 6 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 9 6900HS ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7351Ryzen 9 6900HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7351 and Ryzen 9 6900HS

AMD

EPYC 7351

The EPYC 7351 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,226 points. Launch price was $1,100.

AMD

Ryzen 9 6900HS

The Ryzen 9 6900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,040 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7351 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 6900HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7351 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 6900HS — a 51.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 6900HS (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 7351 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 6900HS uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351 scores 23,226 against the Ryzen 9 6900HS's 23,040 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 7351. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 6900HS.

FeatureEPYC 7351Ryzen 9 6900HS
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
4.9 GHz+69%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+300%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
6 nm-57%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark
23,226
23,040
Cinebench R23 Multi
13,445
Geekbench 6 Single
1,854
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,732
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7351 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 6900HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7351Ryzen 9 6900HS
Socket
TR4
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7351) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 6900HS). The Ryzen 9 6900HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the EPYC 7351 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureEPYC 7351Ryzen 9 6900HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 680M
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V