EPYC 7351 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7351 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7351 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7351

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Draws 155W instead of 180W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,150 vs 23,226).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while EPYC 7351 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌16.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7351 better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is ahead with a 12.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7351 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. EPYC 7351 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7351 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7351 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7351 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 12.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7351 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7351 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7351

The EPYC 7351 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,226 points. Launch price was $1,100.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,150 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7351 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7351 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — a 36.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 7351 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351 scores 23,226 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X's 23,150 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 7351. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.

Feature	EPYC 7351	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	4.2 GHz+45%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+46%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+100%	32 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	23,226	23,150

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7351 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.