EPYC 7351 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS

AMD

EPYC 7351

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2017
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 7435HS

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2023
Ryzen family
·······

EPYC 7351 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7351 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7351 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7351

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

  • 244.4% higher power demand at 155W vs 45W.
  • Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7435HS moves to FP7r2 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 7435HS

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 155W, a 110W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7351 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (23,101 vs 23,226).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7351, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7351 better than Ryzen 7 7435HS?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7351 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7435HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7351 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7351 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 7351 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 7351 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 7435HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FP7r2 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7351 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7351

The EPYC 7351 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,226 points. Launch price was $1,100.

AMD

Ryzen 7 7435HS

The Ryzen 7 7435HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,101 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7351 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7435HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7351 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7435HS — a 43.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7435HS (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 7351 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7435HS uses Rembrandt R (2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351 scores 23,226 against the Ryzen 7 7435HS's 23,101 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 7351. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7435HS.

FeatureEPYC 7351Ryzen 7 7435HS
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
4.5 GHz+55%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz+29%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+300%
16 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+12700%
4 MB
Process
14 nm
6 nm-57%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Rembrandt R (2025)
PassMark
23,226
23,101
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7351 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7435HS uses FP7r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7351Ryzen 7 7435HS
Socket
TR4
FP7r2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0