EPYC 7351 vs Xeon W-2175

EPYC 7351 vs Xeon W-2175 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7351

16 / 32

23,226

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-2175

14 / 28

23,507

+1.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7351 vs Xeon W-2175 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7351 vs Xeon W-2175: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7351

2017

Why buy it

✅+232.5% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 19 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,226 vs 23,507).

Xeon W-2175

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 140W instead of 155W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,947 MSRP, while EPYC 7351 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2175 better than EPYC 7351?

Yes. Xeon W-2175 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2175 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2175 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2175 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2175 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,947 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-2175 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC 7351 vs Xeon W-2175 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7351

The EPYC 7351 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,226 points. Launch price was $1,100.

Xeon W-2175

The Xeon W-2175 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,507 points. Launch price was $1,947.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7351 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-2175 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the EPYC 7351 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351 versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2175 — a 38.9% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2175 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7351 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2175 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351 scores 23,226 against the Xeon W-2175's 23,507 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon W-2175. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351 vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2175.

Feature	EPYC 7351	Xeon W-2175
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+14%	14 / 28
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	4.3 GHz+48%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.5 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+232%	19.25 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	23,226	23,507+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7351 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2175 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.