EPYC 7351 vs Xeon Platinum 8176

EPYC 7351 vs Xeon Platinum 8176 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7351

16 / 32

23,226

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Platinum 8176

28 / 56

23,179

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7351 vs Xeon Platinum 8176 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7351 vs Xeon Platinum 8176: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7351

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
✅Draws 155W instead of 165W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Platinum 8176

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,179 vs 23,226).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 64 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7351 better than Xeon Platinum 8176?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8176 is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7351 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. EPYC 7351 also has the bigger cache pool with 66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7351 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7351 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 7351 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8176 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

EPYC 7351 vs Xeon Platinum 8176 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7351

The EPYC 7351 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,226 points. Launch price was $1,100.

Xeon Platinum 8176

The Xeon Platinum 8176 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,179 points. Launch price was $8,719.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7351 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8176 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8176 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8176 — a 26.9% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8176 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 7351 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8176 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351 scores 23,226 against the Xeon Platinum 8176's 23,179 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 7351. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351 vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8176.

Feature	EPYC 7351	Xeon Platinum 8176
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	28 / 56+75%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.8 GHz+31%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+66%	38.5 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+1729%	28 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	23,226	23,179

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7351 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8176 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.