Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 9 7940HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

16 Cores32 Thrd180 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2018

Threadripper family

··

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 7940HS

8 / 16

29,986

+1.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

16 / 32

29,462

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 180W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen Threadripper 2950X needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,443 vs 21,444).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

2018

Why buy it

✅+22.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $899 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌414.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7940HS better than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 2950X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7940HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is the stronger fit. You are getting 22.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7940HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 9 7940HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $899 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 22.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (32.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7940HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,986 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 29,462 points. Launch price was $899.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 7940HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HS versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS (base: 4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7940HS scores 29,986 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X's 29,462 — a 1.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,443 vs 21,444 (20.6% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,646 vs 1,255, a 71.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,591 vs 8,814 (27.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7940HS	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+18%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+14%	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	32 MB+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	4 nm-67%	12 nm
Architecture	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)	ZEN+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	29,986+2%	29,462
Cinebench R23 Multi	17,443	21,444+23%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,646+111%	1,255
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,591+32%	8,814

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940HS versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) and Socket TR4 / X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X).

Feature	Ryzen 9 7940HS	Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Socket	FP8	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+91%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	256 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen 9 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7940HS targets Thin-and-light Performance. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940HS rivals Core i9-13900H.