Core Ultra 5 235H vs Ryzen 9 7940HS

Intel

Core Ultra 5 235H

14 Cores14 Thrd20 WWMax: 5 GHz2025
Core Ultra family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 7940HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023
Ryzen family
·······

Core Ultra 5 235H vs Ryzen 9 7940HS Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 235H vs Ryzen 9 7940HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 235H vs Ryzen 9 7940HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 235H

2025

Why buy it

  • +0.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • Draws 20W instead of 35W, a 15W reduction.
  • 40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7940HS.

Ryzen 9 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core Ultra 5 235H.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,443 vs 17,607).
  • 75% higher power demand at 35W vs 20W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 235H better than Ryzen 9 7940HS?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 9 7940HS is ahead with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 235H pulls ahead with 0.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 235H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 235H still makes the most sense overall. Core Ultra 5 235H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 235H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 14 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 235H vs Ryzen 9 7940HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 235H

The Core Ultra 5 235H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 29,820 points. Launch price was $354.

AMD

Ryzen 9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,986 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 235H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 235H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235H versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HS — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS (base: 4.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 235H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 235H scores 29,820 against the Ryzen 9 7940HS's 29,986 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,607 vs 17,443 (0.9% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,693 vs 2,646, a 1.8% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,040 vs 11,591 (19.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 235H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HS.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 235HRyzen 9 7940HS
Cores / Threads
14 / 14+75%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5 GHz
5.2 GHz+4%
Base Clock
4.4 GHz+10%
4 GHz
L3 Cache
18 MB+13%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm
4 nm-20%
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark
29,820
29,986
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,607
17,443
Geekbench 6 Single
2,693+2%
2,646
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,040+21%
11,591
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 235H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 235H versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940HS — the Core Ultra 5 235H supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 7940HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 235H) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) — the Core Ultra 5 235H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 235H) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 9 7940HS).

FeatureCore Ultra 5 235HRyzen 9 7940HS
Socket
FCBGA2049
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400+14%
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
256 GB+33%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28+40%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 235H) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics Intel Arc 140T Graphics (Core Ultra 5 235H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 7940HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 235H targets Thin-and-light Performance Laptop, Ryzen 9 7940HS targets Thin-and-light Performance. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 235H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H; Ryzen 9 7940HS rivals Core i9-13900H.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 235HRyzen 9 7940HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140T Graphics
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Thin-and-light Performance Laptop
Thin-and-light Performance