Core Ultra 5 235H
EPYC 7282
Core Ultra 5 235H vs EPYC 7282 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 235H vs EPYC 7282 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 235H vs EPYC 7282: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 235H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 120W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 140T Graphics, while EPYC 7282 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7282, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7282
2019Why buy it
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 235H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 17,607).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $650 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 235H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌500% higher power demand at 120W vs 20W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 235H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 235H better than EPYC 7282?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 235H vs EPYC 7282 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 5 235H
The Core Ultra 5 235H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 29,820 points. Launch price was $354.
EPYC 7282
The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 235H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the EPYC 7282 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7282 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235H versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 — a 43.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 235H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 7282 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 235H scores 29,820 against the EPYC 7282's 30,201 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 7282. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,607 vs 13,500 (26.4% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,693 vs 1,086, a 85% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,040 vs 7,638 (59.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 235H vs 64 MB on the EPYC 7282.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235H | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+56% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+57% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB | 64 MB+256% |
| L2 Cache | — | 8 MB |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 29,820 | 30,201+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,607+30% | 13,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,693+148% | 1,086 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,040+84% | 7,638 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 235H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7282 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 235H versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 — the Core Ultra 5 235H supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 235H) vs 8 (EPYC 7282). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 235H) vs 128 (EPYC 7282) — the EPYC 7282 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 235H) and SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235H | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+100% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 5 235H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 235H) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282). The Core Ultra 5 235H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140T Graphics), while the EPYC 7282 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 235H targets Thin-and-light Performance Laptop, EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 235H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H; EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235H | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 140T Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V, SEV |
| Target Use | Thin-and-light Performance Laptop | Edge Server / Entry Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 5 235H and EPYC 7282
