Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Xeon W-3265
Ryzen 9 7940HS
Xeon W-3265
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 7940HS
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3265
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 7940HS | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,400) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 7940HS | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,400) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7940HS and Xeon W-3265
Ryzen 9 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,986 points. Launch price was $299.
Xeon W-3265
The Xeon W-3265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,105 points. Launch price was $3,349.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7940HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3265 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3265 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HS versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS (base: 4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-3265 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7940HS scores 29,986 against the Xeon W-3265's 30,105 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon W-3265. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HS vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940HS | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+13% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+48% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 33 MB+106% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 24 MB+2300% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 29,986 | 30,105 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,443 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,646 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,591 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3265 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940HS versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3265 — the Xeon W-3265 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3265 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs 6 (Xeon W-3265). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265) — the Xeon W-3265 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) and C621,C620 (Xeon W-3265).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940HS | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 2933+58560% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+26214300% | 1024 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs true (Xeon W-3265). The Ryzen 9 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon W-3265 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7940HS targets Thin-and-light Performance. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940HS rivals Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940HS | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Thin-and-light Performance | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 7940HS and Xeon W-3265
