PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Gold 6248 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon Gold 6248.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,443 vs 19,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6248, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 6248

2019

Why buy it

✅+8.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7940HS.

Ryzen 9 7940HS

2023

Xeon Gold 6248

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Gold 6248 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon Gold 6248.

Why buy it

✅+8.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,443 vs 19,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6248, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7940HS.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7940HS better than Xeon Gold 6248?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6248 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7940HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6248 is the better fit. You are getting 8.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7940HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 9 7940HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 36.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7940HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 7940HS Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6248 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 7940HS	Xeon Gold 6248
1080p
low	267 FPS	186 FPS
medium	242 FPS	151 FPS
high	203 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	146 FPS
medium	193 FPS	115 FPS
high	157 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	163 FPS	68 FPS
medium	136 FPS	57 FPS
high	105 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7940HS Open Xeon Gold 6248

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 7940HS	Xeon Gold 6248
1080p
low	497 FPS	401 FPS
medium	408 FPS	349 FPS
high	349 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	311 FPS	244 FPS
1440p
low	434 FPS	348 FPS
medium	376 FPS	310 FPS
high	322 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	215 FPS
4K
low	286 FPS	227 FPS
medium	259 FPS	202 FPS
high	243 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	147 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7940HS Open Xeon Gold 6248

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 7940HS	Xeon Gold 6248
1080p
low	750 FPS	738 FPS
medium	750 FPS	738 FPS
high	730 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	624 FPS	648 FPS
1440p
low	750 FPS	705 FPS
medium	646 FPS	605 FPS
high	545 FPS	573 FPS
ultra	467 FPS	506 FPS
4K
low	544 FPS	455 FPS
medium	475 FPS	357 FPS
high	422 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	259 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7940HS Open Xeon Gold 6248

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 7940HS	Xeon Gold 6248
1080p
low	750 FPS	738 FPS
medium	750 FPS	738 FPS
high	750 FPS	663 FPS
ultra	750 FPS	576 FPS
1440p
low	750 FPS	682 FPS
medium	750 FPS	598 FPS
high	658 FPS	516 FPS
ultra	573 FPS	442 FPS
4K
low	574 FPS	469 FPS
medium	511 FPS	421 FPS
high	456 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	327 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7940HS Open Xeon Gold 6248

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7940HS and Xeon Gold 6248

Ryzen 9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,986 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6248

The Xeon Gold 6248 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 29,535 points. Launch price was $3,072.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 7940HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6248 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6248 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HS versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6248 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS (base: 4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6248 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7940HS scores 29,986 against the Xeon Gold 6248's 29,535 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,443 vs 19,000 (8.5% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6248). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,646 vs 1,327, a 66.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,591 vs 15,277 (27.4% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6248). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HS vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6248.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7940HS	Xeon Gold 6248
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	20 / 40+150%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+33%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+60%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	27.5 MB+72%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	20 MB+1900%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	29,986+2%	29,535
Cinebench R23 Multi	17,443	19,000+9%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,646+99%	1,327
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,591	15,277+32%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6248 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940HS versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6248 — the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6248 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6248). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6248) — the Xeon Gold 6248 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6248).

Feature	Ryzen 9 7940HS	Xeon Gold 6248
Socket	FP8	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	1024 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6248). The Ryzen 9 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Gold 6248 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7940HS targets Thin-and-light Performance, Xeon Gold 6248 targets General Purpose Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940HS rivals Core i9-13900H; Xeon Gold 6248 rivals EPYC 7352.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7940HS	Xeon Gold 6248
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 780M	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Thin-and-light Performance	General Purpose Enterprise Server