Ryzen 9 7940HX vs EPYC 7F72
Ryzen 9 7940HX
EPYC 7F72
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7F72
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 7940HX | EPYC 7F72 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,131) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 7940HX | EPYC 7F72 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,131) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7940HX and EPYC 7F72
Ryzen 9 7940HX
The Ryzen 9 7940HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2024-01-01. It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 53,628 points. Launch price was $600.
EPYC 7F72
The EPYC 7F72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 52,840 points. Launch price was $2,450.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7940HX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7F72 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7F72 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HX versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7F72 — a 33.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7940HX uses the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 7F72 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 53,628 against the EPYC 7F72's 52,840 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HX. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HX vs 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F72.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940HX | EPYC 7F72 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+41% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 192 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 53,628+1% | 52,840 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7940HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7F72 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the Ryzen 9 7940HX versus 3200 on the EPYC 7F72 — the Ryzen 9 7940HX supports 47.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7F72 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7940HX) vs 8 (EPYC 7F72). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7940HX) vs 128 (EPYC 7F72) — the EPYC 7F72 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 7940HX) and SP3 (EPYC 7F72).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940HX | EPYC 7F72 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+63% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7940HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7940HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7940HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7F72). The Ryzen 9 7940HX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the EPYC 7F72 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940HX rivals Core i9-13900HX; EPYC 7F72 rivals Xeon Platinum 8260.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940HX | EPYC 7F72 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 7940HX and EPYC 7F72
