Ryzen 9 9850HX vs EPYC 9174F
Ryzen 9 9850HX
EPYC 9174F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 9850HX
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9174F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 9850HX | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 9850HX | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 9850HX and EPYC 9174F
Ryzen 9 9850HX
The Ryzen 9 9850HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,665 points. Launch price was $499.
EPYC 9174F
The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 9850HX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 9174F offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 9174F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9850HX versus 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9850HX (base: 3 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9850HX uses the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9174F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9850HX scores 51,665 against the EPYC 9174F's 52,249 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 9174F. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9850HX vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9850HX | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+18% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 4.1 GHz+37% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 51,665 | 52,249+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9850HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9174F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Ryzen 9 9850HX versus 4800 on the EPYC 9174F — the Ryzen 9 9850HX supports 15.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 192 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 9850HX) vs 12 (EPYC 9174F). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 9850HX) vs 128 (EPYC 9174F) — the EPYC 9174F offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 9850HX) and SP5 (EPYC 9174F).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9850HX | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+17% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 6144+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 9850HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9850HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9174F). The Ryzen 9 9850HX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the EPYC 9174F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 9850HX rivals Core Ultra 7 255HX; EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9850HX | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 9850HX and EPYC 9174F
