
Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Xeon w7-3455
Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs Xeon w7-3455 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs Xeon w7-3455 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs Xeon w7-3455: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,890 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,489 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 325.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.0 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,489 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 270W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores), while Xeon w7-3455 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-3455, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
Xeon w7-3455
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 26,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 94.0 PassMark/$ ($2,489 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌125% higher power demand at 270W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9900X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9900X3D better than Xeon w7-3455?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs Xeon w7-3455 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 9 9900X3D
The Ryzen 9 9900X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 56,301 points. Launch price was $599.

Xeon w7-3455
The Xeon w7-3455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 54,925 points. Launch price was $2,489.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 9900X3D packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon w7-3455 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon w7-3455 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9900X3D versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3455 — a 13.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X3D (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9900X3D uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w7-3455 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9900X3D scores 56,301 against the Xeon w7-3455's 54,925 — a 2.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,400 vs 1,900, a 56.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 9900X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,000 vs 1,898 (172.8% advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X3D). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3455.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X3D | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 24 / 48+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+15% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+76% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+90% | 67.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 56,301+3% | 54,925 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,400+79% | 1,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,000+1270% | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9900X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-3455 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 9900X3D versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3455 — the Ryzen 9 9900X3D supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3455 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 9900X3D) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3455). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 9900X3D) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3455) — the Xeon w7-3455 offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670,X670E,X870,X870E (Ryzen 9 9900X3D) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3455).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X3D | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+17% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 112+367% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9900X3D) vs true (Xeon w7-3455). The Ryzen 9 9900X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores)), while the Xeon w7-3455 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 9900X3D targets High End Gaming/Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 9900X3D rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon w7-3455 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X3D | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | High End Gaming/Creation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 9 9900X3D was priced at $599, while the Xeon w7-3455 came in at $2489. On launch pricing ($599 vs $2489), Ryzen 9 9900X3D was $1890 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 9900X3D delivers 94.0 pts/$ vs 22.1 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3455 — making the Ryzen 9 9900X3D the 123.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X3D | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-76% | $2489 |
| Performance per Dollar | 94.0+325% | 22.1 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














