EPYC 8324P
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 8324P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 94.0 PassMark/$ ($1,895 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9900X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,296 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 211.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.0 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores), while EPYC 8324P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (56,301 vs 57,127).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9900X3D better than EPYC 8324P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 8324P
The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
The Ryzen 9 9900X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 56,301 points. Launch price was $599.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8324P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9900X3D offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 8324P has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P versus 5.5 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9900X3D — a 58.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X3D (base: 2.65 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 8324P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9900X3D uses Granite Ridge (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324P scores 57,127 against the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's 56,301 — a 1.5% lead for the EPYC 8324P. Both processors carry 128 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen 9 9900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+167% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 5.5 GHz+83% |
| Base Clock | 2.65 GHz | 4.4 GHz+66% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 57,127+1% | 56,301 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,400 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 26,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8324P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 9900X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8324P versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 9900X3D — the Ryzen 9 9900X3D supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8324P supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8324P) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 9900X3D). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8324P) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 9900X3D) — the EPYC 8324P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8324P) and X670,X670E,X870,X870E (Ryzen 9 9900X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen 9 9900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | DDR5-5600+17% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 GB+500% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96+300% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8324P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9900X3D). The Ryzen 9 9900X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores)), while the EPYC 8324P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 9900X3D targets High End Gaming/Creation. Direct competitor: EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Ryzen 9 9900X3D rivals Core Ultra 9 285K.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen 9 9900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | High End Gaming/Creation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 8324P was priced at $1895, while the Ryzen 9 9900X3D came in at $599. On launch pricing ($1895 vs $599), Ryzen 9 9900X3D was $1296 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8324P delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 94.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 9900X3D — making the Ryzen 9 9900X3D the 102.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen 9 9900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1895 | $599-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.1 | 94.0+212% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 8324P and Ryzen 9 9900X3D
