EPYC 8324P vs Xeon W-3365

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8324P

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

EPYC family

····

Buy on Amazon

Xeon W-3365

32 Cores64 Thrd270 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon W-3365 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8324P

32 / 64

57,127

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon W-3365

32 / 64

57,312

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon W-3365 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon W-3365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8324P

2023

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 48 MB).
✅Costs $1,604 less on MSRP ($1,895 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 84.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($1,895 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 270W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3365 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (57,127 vs 57,312).

Xeon W-3365

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 270W vs 180W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3365 better than EPYC 8324P?

Yes. Xeon W-3365 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3365 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3365 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3365 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 8324P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-3365 comes in 84.6% more expensive on MSRP at $3,499 MSRP versus $1,895 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 8324P is also 84.0% better value on MSRP (30.1 vs 16.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8324P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 166.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 48 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon W-3365 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8324P

The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.

Xeon W-3365

The Xeon W-3365 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,312 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 8324P and Xeon W-3365 share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3365 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3365 (base: 2.65 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 8324P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3365 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324P scores 57,127 against the Xeon W-3365's 57,312 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon W-3365. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3365.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon W-3365
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4 GHz+33%
Base Clock	2.65 GHz	2.7 GHz+2%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+167%	48 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	57,127	57,312
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,817

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3365 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8324P versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3365 — the EPYC 8324P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3365 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1152 GB — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8324P) vs 8 (Xeon W-3365). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8324P) vs 64 (Xeon W-3365) — the EPYC 8324P offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8324P) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3365).

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon W-3365
Socket	SP6	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	4800+50%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	1152 GB	4096 GB+256%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+50%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8324P) vs true (Xeon W-3365). Direct competitor: EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon W-3365 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon W-3365
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8324P was priced at $1895, while the Xeon W-3365 came in at $3499. On launch pricing ($1895 vs $3499), EPYC 8324P was $1604 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8324P delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3365 — making the EPYC 8324P the 59.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon W-3365
MSRP	$1895-46%	$3499
Performance per Dollar	30.1+84%	16.4
Release Date	2023	2021

Search EPYC 8324P on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3365 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.