EPYC 8324P vs EPYC 9135

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8324P

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

EPYC family

····

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9135

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8324P vs EPYC 9135 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8324P

32 / 64

57,127

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 9135

16 / 32

57,808

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8324P vs EPYC 9135 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8324P vs EPYC 9135: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8324P

2023

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 128 MB vs 64 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Draws 180W instead of 200W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (57,127 vs 57,808).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 47.6 PassMark/$ ($1,895 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).

EPYC 9135

2024

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $681 less on MSRP ($1,214 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
✅Delivers 58.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.6 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($1,214 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (64 MB vs 128 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9135 better than EPYC 8324P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 8324P is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9135 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. EPYC 8324P also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9135 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9135 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9135 comes in $681 cheaper on MSRP at $1,214 MSRP versus $1,895 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 8324P is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 58.0% better value on MSRP (47.6 vs 30.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9135 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8324P vs EPYC 9135 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8324P

The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.

EPYC 9135

The EPYC 9135 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,808 points. Launch price was $1,214.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8324P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9135 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 8324P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9135 — a 35.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9135 (base: 2.65 GHz vs 3.65 GHz). The EPYC 8324P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9135 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324P scores 57,127 against the EPYC 9135's 57,808 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 9135. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9135.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	EPYC 9135
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+100%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.3 GHz+43%
Base Clock	2.65 GHz	3.65 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+100%	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	4 nm-20%
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	57,127	57,808+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9135 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8324P versus 6000 on the EPYC 9135 — the EPYC 9135 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9135 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 1152 — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8324P) vs 12 (EPYC 9135). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8324P) vs 128 (EPYC 9135) — the EPYC 9135 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8324P) and SP5 (EPYC 9135).

Feature	EPYC 8324P	EPYC 9135
Socket	SP6	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	4800	6000+25%
Max RAM Capacity	1152	6144+433%
RAM Channels	6	12+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96	128+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; EPYC 9135 rivals Xeon Platinum 8558P.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	EPYC 9135
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8324P was priced at $1895, while the EPYC 9135 came in at $1214. On launch pricing ($1895 vs $1214), EPYC 9135 was $681 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8324P delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 47.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9135 — making the EPYC 9135 the 44.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	EPYC 9135
MSRP	$1895	$1214-36%
Performance per Dollar	30.1	47.6+58%
Release Date	2023	2024

Search EPYC 8324P on Amazon

Search EPYC 9135 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.