EPYC 8324P vs EPYC 9135
EPYC 8324P
EPYC 9135
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 8324P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9135
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 8324P | EPYC 9135 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,598) | ✅ More affordable ($95) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 8324P | EPYC 9135 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+3733%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,598) | ✅ More affordable ($95) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8324P and EPYC 9135
EPYC 8324P
The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.
EPYC 9135
The EPYC 9135 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,808 points. Launch price was $1,214.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8324P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9135 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 8324P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9135 — a 35.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9135 (base: 2.65 GHz vs 3.65 GHz). The EPYC 8324P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 9135 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324P scores 57,127 against the EPYC 9135's 57,808 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 9135. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9135.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | EPYC 9135 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.3 GHz+43% |
| Base Clock | 2.65 GHz | 3.65 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 57,127 | 57,808+1% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8324P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9135 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8324P versus 6000 on the EPYC 9135 — the EPYC 9135 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9135 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 1152 — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8324P) vs 12 (EPYC 9135). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8324P) vs 128 (EPYC 9135) — the EPYC 9135 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8324P) and SP5 (EPYC 9135).
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | EPYC 9135 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 6000+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 | 6144+433% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 12+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 96 | 128+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; EPYC 9135 rivals Xeon Platinum 8558P.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | EPYC 9135 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 8324P launched at $1895 MSRP, while the EPYC 9135 debuted at $1214. At current prices ($3598 vs $95), the EPYC 9135 is $3503 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8324P delivers 15.9 pts/$ vs 608.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 9135 — making the EPYC 9135 the 189.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | EPYC 9135 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1895 | $1214-36% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3598 | $95-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9 | 608.5+3727% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 8324P and EPYC 9135
