EPYC 8324P
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 8324P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 350W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($1,895 MSRP vs $1,340 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $555 less on MSRP ($1,340 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.4 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($1,340 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (56,854 vs 57,127).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌94.4% higher power demand at 350W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX better than EPYC 8324P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 8324P
The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 56,854 points. Launch price was $2,000.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8324P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 8324P has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (base: 2.65 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 8324P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324P scores 57,127 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX's 56,854 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 8324P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+167% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 5.4 GHz+80% |
| Base Clock | 2.65 GHz | 4.7 GHz+77% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 57,127 | 56,854 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8324P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8324P versus 6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 1152 — 77.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8324P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8324P) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8324P) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX).
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 6400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 | 2048+78% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96 | 128+33% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8324P) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX rivals Xeon w7-3545.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 8324P was priced at $1895, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX came in at $1340. On launch pricing ($1895 vs $1340), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX was $555 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8324P delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 42.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX the 33.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1895 | $1340-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.1 | 42.4+41% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 8324P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
