EPYC 8324P vs Xeon E7-8895 v2

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8324P

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

EPYC family

····

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E7-8895 v2

15 Cores30 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8324P

32 / 64

57,127

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon E7-8895 v2

15 / 30

57,165

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon E7-8895 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8324P

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,946 less on MSRP ($1,895 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
✅Delivers 260.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($1,895 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011 and older memory support.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (57,127 vs 57,165).
❌16.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 155W.

Xeon E7-8895 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 155W instead of 180W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8324P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($6,841 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011, while EPYC 8324P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8324P better than Xeon E7-8895 v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 8324P is ahead with a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8895 v2 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. EPYC 8324P also has the bigger cache pool with 241.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 38 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8895 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 15 cores and 30 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8324P is the better buy right now. EPYC 8324P comes in $4,946 cheaper on MSRP at $1,895 MSRP versus $6,841 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E7-8895 v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 260.8% better value on MSRP (30.1 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8324P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA2011, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 38 MB, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8324P

The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.

Xeon E7-8895 v2

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2014-02-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 57,165 points. Launch price was $6,841.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8324P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the EPYC 8324P has 17 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E7-8895 v2 (base: 2.65 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 8324P is built on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 8324P scores 57,127 against the Xeon E7-8895 v2's 57,165 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E7-8895 v2. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-8895 v2.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon E7-8895 v2
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+113%	15 / 30
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.6 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.65 GHz	2.8 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+241%	37.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	5 nm-77%	22 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	57,127	57,165

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8324P versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — the EPYC 8324P supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-8895 v2 supports up to 1536 of RAM compared to 1152 — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8324P) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8895 v2). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8324P) vs 40 (Xeon E7-8895 v2) — the EPYC 8324P offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8324P) and C602-J (Xeon E7-8895 v2).

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon E7-8895 v2
Socket	SP6	FCLGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+200%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	1152	1536+33%
RAM Channels	6+50%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+140%	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 8324P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon E7-8895 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6386 SE.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon E7-8895 v2
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8324P was priced at $1895, while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 came in at $6841. On launch pricing ($1895 vs $6841), EPYC 8324P was $4946 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8324P delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — making the EPYC 8324P the 113.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP	$1895-72%	$6841
Performance per Dollar	30.1+258%	8.4
Release Date	2023	2014

Search EPYC 8324P on Amazon

Search Xeon E7-8895 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.