EPYC 7552 vs EPYC 8324P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7552

48 Cores96 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8324P

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7552 vs EPYC 8324P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7552

48 / 96

57,414

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 8324P

32 / 64

57,127

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7552 vs EPYC 8324P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7552 vs EPYC 8324P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7552

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 128 MB).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8324P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8324P

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,130 less on MSRP ($1,895 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
✅Delivers 111.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($1,895 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 200W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (57,127 vs 57,414).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 192 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8324P better than EPYC 7552?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 8324P is ahead with a 11.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7552 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. EPYC 7552 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7552 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8324P is the better buy right now. EPYC 8324P comes in $2,130 cheaper on MSRP at $1,895 MSRP versus $4,025 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7552 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 111.3% better value on MSRP (30.1 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8324P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7552 vs EPYC 8324P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7552

The EPYC 7552 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 57,414 points. Launch price was $4,025.

EPYC 8324P

The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7552 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 8324P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7552 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7552 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P — a 9.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 7552 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.65 GHz). The EPYC 7552 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 8324P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7552 scores 57,414 against the EPYC 8324P's 57,127 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 7552. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7552 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P.

Feature	EPYC 7552	EPYC 8324P
Cores / Threads	48 / 96+50%	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+10%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.65 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	192 MB (total)+50%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	57,414	57,127

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7552 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 8324P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7552 versus 4800 on the EPYC 8324P — the EPYC 8324P supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7552 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7552) vs 6 (EPYC 8324P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7552) vs 96 (EPYC 8324P) — the EPYC 7552 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7552) and SP6 (EPYC 8324P).

Feature	EPYC 7552	EPYC 8324P
Socket	SP3	SP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096+256%	1152
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+33%	96

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 8324P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7552 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Feature	EPYC 7552	EPYC 8324P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7552 was priced at $4025, while the EPYC 8324P came in at $1895. On launch pricing ($4025 vs $1895), EPYC 8324P was $2130 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7552 delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 8324P — making the EPYC 8324P the 71.5% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7552	EPYC 8324P
MSRP	$4025	$1895-53%
Performance per Dollar	14.3	30.1+110%
Release Date	2019	2023

Search EPYC 7552 on Amazon

Search EPYC 8324P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.