
EPYC 7552

Xeon Gold 6423N
EPYC 7552 vs Xeon Gold 6423N Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7552 vs Xeon Gold 6423N FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7552 vs Xeon Gold 6423N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7552
2019Why buy it
- ✅+265.7% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 53 MB).
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6423N across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (57,414 vs 57,434).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $2,161 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6423N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6423N
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,864 less on MSRP ($2,161 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 86.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($2,161 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 195W instead of 200W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 192 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6423N better than EPYC 7552?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7552 vs Xeon Gold 6423N Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7552
The EPYC 7552 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 57,414 points. Launch price was $4,025.

Xeon Gold 6423N
The Xeon Gold 6423N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2023-07-01. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 195 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 57,434 points. Launch price was $2,161.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7552 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6423N offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the EPYC 7552 has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7552 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6423N — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6423N (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 7552 is built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7552 scores 57,414 against the Xeon Gold 6423N's 57,434 — a 0% lead for the Xeon Gold 6423N. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7552 vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6423N.
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Xeon Gold 6423N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+71% | 28 / 56 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+10% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 192 MB (total)+266% | 52.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 57,414 | 57,434 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7552 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6423N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7552 versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6423N — the Xeon Gold 6423N supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7552) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6423N) — the EPYC 7552 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7552) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6423N).
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Xeon Gold 6423N |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6423N supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7552 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon Gold 6423N rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Xeon Gold 6423N |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7552 was priced at $4025, while the Xeon Gold 6423N came in at $2161. On launch pricing ($4025 vs $2161), Xeon Gold 6423N was $1864 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7552 delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 26.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6423N — making the Xeon Gold 6423N the 60.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7552 | Xeon Gold 6423N |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4025 | $2161-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 26.6+86% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















