EPYC 7552 vs EPYC 9135

EPYC 7552 vs EPYC 9135 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7552

48 / 96

57,414

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

EPYC 9135

16 / 32

57,808

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7552 vs EPYC 9135 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7552 vs EPYC 9135: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7552

2019

Why buy it

✅+200% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 64 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9135 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (57,414 vs 57,808).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 47.6 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 9135 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

EPYC 9135

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,811 less on MSRP ($1,214 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
✅Delivers 233.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.6 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($1,214 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 192 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9135 better than EPYC 7552?

Yes. EPYC 9135 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9135 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9135 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9135 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9135 comes in $2,811 cheaper on MSRP at $1,214 MSRP versus $4,025 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 233.8% better value on MSRP (47.6 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9135 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 48/96, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7552 vs EPYC 9135 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7552

The EPYC 7552 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 57,414 points. Launch price was $4,025.

EPYC 9135

The EPYC 9135 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,808 points. Launch price was $1,214.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7552 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9135 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7552 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7552 versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9135 — a 26.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9135 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.65 GHz). The EPYC 7552 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 9135 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7552 scores 57,414 against the EPYC 9135's 57,808 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 9135. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7552 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9135.

Feature	EPYC 7552	EPYC 9135
Cores / Threads	48 / 96+200%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	4.3 GHz+30%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.65 GHz+66%
L3 Cache	192 MB (total)+200%	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	57,414	57,808

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7552 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9135 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7552 versus 6000 on the EPYC 9135 — the EPYC 9135 supports 87.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9135 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7552) vs 12 (EPYC 9135). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7552) and SP5 (EPYC 9135).

Feature	EPYC 7552	EPYC 9135
Socket	SP3	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	6000+88%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	6144+50%
RAM Channels	8	12+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9135 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7552 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; EPYC 9135 rivals Xeon Platinum 8558P.

Feature	EPYC 7552	EPYC 9135
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7552 was priced at $4025, while the EPYC 9135 came in at $1214. On launch pricing ($4025 vs $1214), EPYC 9135 was $2811 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7552 delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 47.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9135 — making the EPYC 9135 the 107.8% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7552	EPYC 9135
MSRP	$4025	$1214-70%
Performance per Dollar	14.3	47.6+233%
Release Date	2019	2024

Search EPYC 7552 on Amazon

Search EPYC 9135 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.