EPYC 7552 vs Xeon E7-8895 v2

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7552

48 Cores96 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E7-8895 v2

15 Cores30 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7552 vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7552

48 / 96

57,414

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon E7-8895 v2

15 / 30

57,165

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7552 vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7552 vs Xeon E7-8895 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7552

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+412% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 38 MB).
✅Costs $2,816 less on MSRP ($4,025 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
✅Delivers 70.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.3 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
✅220% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7-8895 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌29% higher power demand at 200W vs 155W.

Xeon E7-8895 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 155W instead of 200W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (57,165 vs 57,414).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 192 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($6,841 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7552 better than Xeon E7-8895 v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E7-8895 v2 is ahead with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7552 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. EPYC 7552 also has the bigger cache pool with 412% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 38 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7552 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 412% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 38 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7552 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7552 comes in $2,816 cheaper on MSRP at $4,025 MSRP versus $6,841 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E7-8895 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 70.7% better value on MSRP (14.3 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7552 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014), 412% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 38 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 15/30. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7552 vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7552

The EPYC 7552 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 57,414 points. Launch price was $4,025.

Xeon E7-8895 v2

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2014-02-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 57,165 points. Launch price was $6,841.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7552 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the EPYC 7552 has 33 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7552 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E7-8895 v2 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7552 is built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7552 scores 57,414 against the Xeon E7-8895 v2's 57,165 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 7552. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7552 vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-8895 v2.

Feature	EPYC 7552	Xeon E7-8895 v2
Cores / Threads	48 / 96+220%	15 / 30
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.8 GHz+27%
L3 Cache	192 MB (total)+412%	37.5 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	—
PassMark	57,414	57,165

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7552 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7552 versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — the EPYC 7552 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7552 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1536 — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7552) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8895 v2). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7552) vs 40 (Xeon E7-8895 v2) — the EPYC 7552 offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7552) and C602-J (Xeon E7-8895 v2).

Feature	EPYC 7552	Xeon E7-8895 v2
Socket	SP3	FCLGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+100%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	4096+167%	1536
RAM Channels	8+100%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+220%	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7552 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon E7-8895 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6386 SE.

Feature	EPYC 7552	Xeon E7-8895 v2
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7552 was priced at $4025, while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 came in at $6841. On launch pricing ($4025 vs $6841), EPYC 7552 was $2816 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7552 delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — making the EPYC 7552 the 52.2% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7552	Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP	$4025-41%	$6841
Performance per Dollar	14.3+70%	8.4
Release Date	2019	2014

Search EPYC 7552 on Amazon

Search Xeon E7-8895 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.