EPYC 7552 vs Xeon W-3365

EPYC 7552 vs Xeon W-3365 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7552

48 / 96

57,414

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon W-3365

32 / 64

57,312

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7552 vs Xeon W-3365 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7552 vs Xeon W-3365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7552

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 48 MB).
✅Draws 200W instead of 270W, a 70W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3365 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($4,025 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3365

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $526 less on MSRP ($3,499 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $4,025 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (57,312 vs 57,414).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 192 MB).
❌35% higher power demand at 270W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3365 better than EPYC 7552?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-3365 is ahead with a 19.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7552 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. EPYC 7552 also has the bigger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 48 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7552 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 48 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3365 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3365 comes in $526 cheaper on MSRP at $3,499 MSRP versus $4,025 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7552 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 14.8% better value on MSRP (16.4 vs 14.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3365 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7552 vs Xeon W-3365 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7552

The EPYC 7552 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 57,414 points. Launch price was $4,025.

Xeon W-3365

The Xeon W-3365 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,312 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7552 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon W-3365 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7552 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7552 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3365 — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3365 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 7552 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon W-3365 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7552 scores 57,414 against the Xeon W-3365's 57,312 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 7552. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7552 vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3365.

Feature	EPYC 7552	Xeon W-3365
Cores / Threads	48 / 96+50%	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	4 GHz+21%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.7 GHz+23%
L3 Cache	192 MB (total)+300%	48 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	57,414	57,312
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,817

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7552 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3365 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7552) vs 64 (Xeon W-3365) — the EPYC 7552 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7552) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3365).

Feature	EPYC 7552	Xeon W-3365
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3365 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7552) vs true (Xeon W-3365). Direct competitor: EPYC 7552 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon W-3365 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7552	Xeon W-3365
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7552 was priced at $4025, while the Xeon W-3365 came in at $3499. On launch pricing ($4025 vs $3499), Xeon W-3365 was $526 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7552 delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3365 — making the Xeon W-3365 the 13.8% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7552	Xeon W-3365
MSRP	$4025	$3499-13%
Performance per Dollar	14.3	16.4+15%
Release Date	2019	2021

Search EPYC 7552 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3365 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.